What is the main difference between Macro CRM and Relaticle?

Macro CRM and Relaticle are both crm systems but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Macro CRM or Relaticle?

The choice between Macro CRM and Relaticle depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Macro CRM to Relaticle?

Migration between Macro CRM and Relaticle is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Windshift – The self-hosted platform that replaces Jira.

Learn More

Macro CRM vs Relaticle

Learn how Macro CRM and Relaticle differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.

Macro CRM

Automatically creates and enriches contacts, companies, and deal threads from your team's email. No data entry, no imports, no admin overhead.

Visit Macro CRM Read more

4,497stars+357(+8.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 hour ago
Repository age
11 months
Version
v2026.9.28.1
License
AGPL-3.0
Repository
macro-inc/macro

Relaticle

Open-source CRM with a built-in AI assistant, 37 MCP tools for external agents, custom fields, role-based permissions, and a REST API. No per-seat pricing.

Visit Relaticle Read more

1,742stars+169(+11%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
3 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v3.5.11
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
relaticle/relaticle

Detailed Comparison

Relaticle appears to have several advantages over Macro CRM, particularly in growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Macro CRM wins

Community & Popularity

Macro CRM leads in popularity with 4,497 stars vs 1,742 stars for Relaticle. The 158% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Macro CRM has 435 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Relaticle wins

Growth Momentum

Relaticle is growing faster, adding 169 stars in the last 30 days (+11%) against adding 357 stars for Macro CRM (+8.6%). Relaticle is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Macro CRM last updated 1 hour ago and Relaticle 3 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Macro CRM uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri while Relaticle leverages PHP, Laravel.

Relaticle wins

Project Maturity

Relaticle has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to Macro CRM which began 11 months ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Relaticle may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.

Relaticle wins

Hosting & Deployment

Relaticle provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.