Learn how Erxes and Relaticle differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.

Both Erxes and Relaticle have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Erxes leads in popularity with 4,064 stars vs 1,511 stars for Relaticle. The 169% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Erxes has 1,305 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Relaticle is growing faster, adding 57 stars in the last 30 days (+3.9%) against adding 27 stars for Erxes (+0.7%). Relaticle is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Erxes last updated 10 hours ago and Relaticle 21 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Erxes uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js, SCSS, Golang while Relaticle leverages PHP, Laravel.
Erxes has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Relaticle which began 2 years ago. This 8.0-year head start suggests Erxes may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems. However, they also have distinct specializations: Erxes also focuses on Customer Communication Platforms, Marketing Automation.
Relaticle provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Erxes may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository