Learn how Erxes and Relaticle differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
3.4.13License
AGPL-3.0Repository
erxes/erxes
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v3.8.1License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
relaticle/relaticle
Both Erxes and Relaticle have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Erxes leads in popularity with 4,110 stars vs 1,808 stars for Relaticle. The 127% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Erxes has 1,333 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Relaticle is growing faster, adding 56 stars in the last 30 days (+3.2%) against adding 18 stars for Erxes (+0.4%). Relaticle is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Erxes last updated 8 hours ago and Relaticle 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Erxes uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js, Golang, SCSS while Relaticle leverages PHP, Laravel.
Erxes has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Relaticle which began 2 years ago. This 8.0-year head start suggests Erxes may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems. However, they also have distinct specializations: Erxes also focuses on Customer Communication Platforms, Marketing Automation.
Relaticle provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Erxes may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.