Learn how Atomic CRM and Erxes differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Atomic CRM and Erxes have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Erxes significantly outpaces Atomic CRM in community adoption with 4,061 stars compared to 1,198 stars on GitHub. This 3.4x difference suggests Erxes has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Erxes has 1,303 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Atomic CRM is growing faster, adding 56 stars in the last 30 days (+4.9%) against adding 26 stars for Erxes (+0.6%). Atomic CRM is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Atomic CRM last updated 22 hours ago and Erxes 44 minutes ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Erxes leverages CSS, Bash, Python, Next.js, SCSS, Golang.
Erxes has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Atomic CRM which began 2 years ago. This 7.7-year head start suggests Erxes may have more mature features and established processes.
Atomic CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Erxes's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems. However, they also have distinct specializations: Erxes extends into Customer Communication Platforms, Marketing Automation.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs