What is the main difference between Atomic CRM and Erxes?

Atomic CRM and Erxes are both crm systems but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Atomic CRM or Erxes?

The choice between Atomic CRM and Erxes depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Atomic CRM to Erxes?

Migration between Atomic CRM and Erxes is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.

Learn More

Learn more

Atomic CRM vs Erxes

Learn how Atomic CRM and Erxes differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.

Atomic CRM

Build a customizable CRM that matches your company's vision, designed for developers and loved by end users.

Visit Atomic CRM Read more

Stars
1,106
Forks
713
Last commit
24 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
License
MIT

Activity score

85/100

View Repository

Erxes

All-in-one solution for marketing, sales, and customer service. Boost engagement, streamline workflows, and drive growth.

Visit Erxes Read more

Stars
4,003
Forks
1,286
Last commit
10 hours ago
Repository age
10 years

Activity score

88/100

View Repository

Detailed Comparison

Both Atomic CRM and Erxes have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Erxes wins

Community & Popularity

Erxes significantly outpaces Atomic CRM in community adoption with 4,003 stars compared to 1,106 stars on GitHub. This 3.6x difference suggests Erxes has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Erxes has 1,286 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Atomic CRM last updated 24 hours ago and Erxes 10 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Erxes leverages CSS, Bash, Python, Next.js, SCSS, Golang.

Erxes wins

Project Maturity

Erxes has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Atomic CRM which began 2 years ago. This 7.7-year head start suggests Erxes may have more mature features and established processes.

Atomic CRM wins

Licensing

Atomic CRM is licensed under MIT, while Erxes's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems. However, they also have distinct specializations: Erxes extends into Customer Communication Platforms, Marketing Automation.

Other tool comparisons to consider