What is the main difference between Atomic CRM and Erxes?

Atomic CRM and Erxes are both crm systems but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Atomic CRM or Erxes?

The choice between Atomic CRM and Erxes depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Atomic CRM to Erxes?

Migration between Atomic CRM and Erxes is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.

Learn More

Atomic CRM vs Erxes

Learn how Atomic CRM and Erxes differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.

Atomic CRM

Build a customizable CRM that matches your company's vision, designed for developers and loved by end users.

Visit Atomic CRM Read more

1,201stars+51(+4.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 days ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v1.5.0
License
MIT
Repository
marmelab/atomic-crm

Erxes

All-in-one solution for marketing, sales, and customer service. Boost engagement, streamline workflows, and drive growth.

Visit Erxes Read more

4,068stars+27(+0.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
8 hours ago
Repository age
10 years
Version
3.0.88
License
AGPL-3.0
Repository
erxes/erxes

Detailed Comparison

Both Atomic CRM and Erxes have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Erxes wins

Community & Popularity

Erxes significantly outpaces Atomic CRM in community adoption with 4,068 stars compared to 1,201 stars on GitHub. This 3.4x difference suggests Erxes has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Erxes has 1,305 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Atomic CRM wins

Growth Momentum

Atomic CRM is growing faster, adding 51 stars in the last 30 days (+4.4%) against adding 27 stars for Erxes (+0.7%). Atomic CRM is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Atomic CRM last updated 6 days ago and Erxes 8 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Erxes leverages CSS, Bash, Python, Next.js, SCSS, Golang.

Erxes wins

Project Maturity

Erxes has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Atomic CRM which began 2 years ago. This 7.7-year head start suggests Erxes may have more mature features and established processes.

Atomic CRM wins

Licensing

Atomic CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Erxes's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems. However, they also have distinct specializations: Erxes extends into Customer Communication Platforms, Marketing Automation.