Ad
 
Learn more

Atomic CRM vs Krayin

Learn how Atomic CRM and Krayin differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Atomic CRM

Atomic CRM

Build a customizable CRM that matches your company's vision, designed for developers and loved by end users.
  • Stars


    934
  • Forks


    627
  • Last commit


    4 days ago
  • Repository age


    2 years
  • License


    MIT
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Atomic CRM
Favicon of Krayin

Krayin

Open source customer relationship management platform with sales tracking, marketing automation, and customizable workflows for businesses of all sizes.
  • Stars


    22,212
  • Forks


    1,437
  • Last commit


    20 hours ago
  • Repository age


    5 years
  • License


    MIT
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Krayin

Detailed Comparison

Krayin appears to have several advantages over Atomic CRM, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Krayin wins
Community & Popularity

Krayin significantly outpaces Atomic CRM in community adoption with 22,212 stars compared to 934 stars on GitHub. This 23.8x difference suggests Krayin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Krayin has 1,437 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Atomic CRM last updated 4 days ago and Krayin 20 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Atomic CRM uses Typescript, JSX while Krayin leverages CSS, PHP, Laravel.

Krayin wins
Project Maturity

Krayin has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Atomic CRM which began 2 years ago. This 3.0-year head start suggests Krayin may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable
Licensing

Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems. However, they also have distinct specializations: Krayin extends into Marketing Automation, Sales Automation.

Krayin wins
Hosting & Deployment

Krayin provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Atomic CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.