What is the main difference between Atomic CRM and Krayin?

Atomic CRM and Krayin are both crm systems but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Atomic CRM or Krayin?

The choice between Atomic CRM and Krayin depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Atomic CRM to Krayin?

Migration between Atomic CRM and Krayin is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn more

Atomic CRM vs Krayin

Learn how Atomic CRM and Krayin differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.

Atomic CRM

Build a customizable CRM that matches your company's vision, designed for developers and loved by end users.

Visit Atomic CRM Read more

1,439stars+82(+6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v1.6.1
License
MIT
Repository
marmelab/atomic-crm

Krayin

Open source customer relationship management platform with sales tracking, marketing automation, and customizable workflows for businesses of all sizes.

Visit Krayin Read more

24,124stars+130(+0.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
12 hours ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
v2.2.8
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
krayin/laravel-crm

Detailed Comparison

Krayin appears to have several advantages over Atomic CRM, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Krayin wins

Community & Popularity

Krayin significantly outpaces Atomic CRM in community adoption with 24,124 stars compared to 1,439 stars on GitHub. This 16.8x difference suggests Krayin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Krayin has 1,680 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Atomic CRM wins

Growth Momentum

Atomic CRM is growing faster, adding 82 stars in the last 30 days (+6%) against adding 130 stars for Krayin (+0.5%). Atomic CRM is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Atomic CRM last updated 2 days ago and Krayin 12 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Atomic CRM uses Typescript, JSX while Krayin leverages CSS, PHP, Laravel.

Krayin wins

Project Maturity

Krayin has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Atomic CRM which began 2 years ago. This 3.0-year head start suggests Krayin may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems. However, they also have distinct specializations: Krayin extends into Marketing Automation, Sales Automation.

Krayin wins

Hosting & Deployment

Krayin provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Atomic CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.