Learn how Krayin and Relaticle differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v2.2.7License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
krayin/laravel-crm
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v3.8.1License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
relaticle/relaticle
Krayin appears to have several advantages over Relaticle, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Krayin significantly outpaces Relaticle in community adoption with 24,107 stars compared to 1,808 stars on GitHub. This 13.3x difference suggests Krayin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Krayin has 1,680 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Relaticle is growing faster, adding 56 stars in the last 30 days (+3.2%) against adding 138 stars for Krayin (+0.6%). Relaticle is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Krayin last updated 3 days ago and Relaticle 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, PHP, Laravel.
Krayin has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Relaticle which began 2 years ago. This 3.4-year head start suggests Krayin may have more mature features and established processes.
Krayin uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Relaticle's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems. However, they also have distinct specializations: Krayin also focuses on Marketing Automation, Sales Automation.
Both Krayin and Relaticle offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs