What is the main difference between Krayin and Macro CRM?

Krayin and Macro CRM are both crm systems but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Krayin or Macro CRM?

The choice between Krayin and Macro CRM depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Krayin to Macro CRM?

Migration between Krayin and Macro CRM is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn more

Krayin vs Macro CRM

Learn how Krayin and Macro CRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.

Krayin

Open source customer relationship management platform with sales tracking, marketing automation, and customizable workflows for businesses of all sizes.

Visit Krayin Read more

24,033stars+124(+0.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
5 days ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
v2.2.7
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
krayin/laravel-crm

Macro CRM

Automatically creates and enriches contacts, companies, and deal threads from your team's email. No data entry, no imports, no admin overhead.

Visit Macro CRM Read more

4,778stars+414(+9.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
3 hours ago
Repository age
1 year
Version
v2026.10.18.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Repository
macro-inc/macro

Detailed Comparison

Krayin appears to have several advantages over Macro CRM, particularly in popularity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Krayin wins

Community & Popularity

Krayin significantly outpaces Macro CRM in community adoption with 24,033 stars compared to 4,778 stars on GitHub. This 5.0x difference suggests Krayin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Krayin has 1,670 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Macro CRM wins

Growth Momentum

Macro CRM is growing faster, adding 414 stars in the last 30 days (+9.5%) against adding 124 stars for Krayin (+0.5%). Macro CRM is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Krayin last updated 5 days ago and Macro CRM 3 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Krayin uses PHP, Laravel while Macro CRM leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri.

Krayin wins

Project Maturity

Krayin has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Macro CRM which began 1 year ago. This 4.5-year head start suggests Krayin may have more mature features and established processes.

Krayin wins

Licensing

Krayin uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Macro CRM's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems. However, they also have distinct specializations: Krayin also focuses on Marketing Automation, Sales Automation.

Krayin wins

Hosting & Deployment

Krayin provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.