What is the main difference between Atomic CRM and Macro CRM?

Atomic CRM and Macro CRM are both crm systems but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Atomic CRM or Macro CRM?

The choice between Atomic CRM and Macro CRM depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Atomic CRM to Macro CRM?

Migration between Atomic CRM and Macro CRM is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.

Learn More

Atomic CRM vs Macro CRM

Learn how Atomic CRM and Macro CRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.

Atomic CRM

Build a customizable CRM that matches your company's vision, designed for developers and loved by end users.

Visit Atomic CRM Read more

1,345stars+116(+9.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v1.6.0
License
MIT
Repository
marmelab/atomic-crm

Macro CRM

Automatically creates and enriches contacts, companies, and deal threads from your team's email. No data entry, no imports, no admin overhead.

Visit Macro CRM Read more

4,595stars+348(+8.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 hours ago
Repository age
11 months
Version
v2026.10.7
License
AGPL-3.0
Repository
macro-inc/macro

Detailed Comparison

Atomic CRM appears to have several advantages over Macro CRM, particularly in growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Macro CRM wins

Community & Popularity

Macro CRM significantly outpaces Atomic CRM in community adoption with 4,595 stars compared to 1,345 stars on GitHub. This 3.4x difference suggests Macro CRM has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Atomic CRM has 853 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Atomic CRM wins

Growth Momentum

Atomic CRM is growing faster, adding 116 stars in the last 30 days (+9.4%) against adding 348 stars for Macro CRM (+8.2%). Atomic CRM is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Atomic CRM last updated 7 hours ago and Macro CRM 2 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Macro CRM leverages CSS, Bash, Python, Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri.

Atomic CRM wins

Project Maturity

Atomic CRM has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to Macro CRM which began 11 months ago. This 1.5-year head start suggests Atomic CRM may have more mature features and established processes.

Atomic CRM wins

Licensing

Atomic CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Macro CRM's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable