Learn how Erxes and Macro CRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
3.4.17License
AGPL-3.0Repository
erxes/erxes
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v2026.11.6.1License
AGPL-3.0Repository
macro-inc/macro
Both Erxes and Macro CRM have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Macro CRM leads in popularity with 6,228 stars vs 4,111 stars for Erxes. The 51% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Erxes has 1,333 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Macro CRM is growing faster, adding 1,594 stars in the last 30 days (+34%) against adding 16 stars for Erxes (+0.4%). Macro CRM is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Erxes last updated 11 hours ago and Macro CRM 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Erxes uses Next.js, Golang, SCSS while Macro CRM leverages Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri.
Erxes has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Macro CRM which began 1 year ago. This 9.1-year head start suggests Erxes may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems. However, they also have distinct specializations: Erxes also focuses on Customer Communication Platforms, Marketing Automation.