Learn how Erxes and Macro CRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Erxes and Macro CRM have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Erxes and Macro CRM show comparable community engagement with 4,067 and 3,884 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Erxes has 1,306 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Macro CRM is growing faster, adding 3,200 stars in the last 30 days (+468%) against adding 25 stars for Erxes (+0.6%). Macro CRM is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Erxes last updated 12 hours ago and Macro CRM 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Erxes uses Next.js, SCSS, Golang while Macro CRM leverages C, Rust, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri.
Erxes has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Macro CRM which began 10 months ago. This 9.1-year head start suggests Erxes may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems. However, they also have distinct specializations: Erxes also focuses on Customer Communication Platforms, Marketing Automation.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs