Learn how Erxes and Macro CRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Erxes and Macro CRM have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Erxes and Macro CRM show comparable community engagement with 4,093 and 4,497 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Erxes has 1,310 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Macro CRM is growing faster, adding 357 stars in the last 30 days (+8.6%) against adding 19 stars for Erxes (+0.5%). Macro CRM is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Erxes last updated 1 hour ago and Macro CRM 1 hour ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Erxes uses Next.js, Golang, SCSS while Macro CRM leverages Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri.
Erxes has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Macro CRM which began 11 months ago. This 9.1-year head start suggests Erxes may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems. However, they also have distinct specializations: Erxes also focuses on Customer Communication Platforms, Marketing Automation.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs