Learn how CRM and Erxes differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
21 hours agoRepository age
3 monthsVersion
v1.16.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
trycompai/crm
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
3.4.5License
AGPL-3.0Repository
erxes/erxes
CRM appears to have several advantages over Erxes, particularly in popularity, growth, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
CRM leads in popularity with 11,733 stars vs 4,102 stars for Erxes. The 186% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, CRM has 1,733 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
CRM is growing faster, adding 787 stars in the last 30 days (+7.2%) against adding 12 stars for Erxes (+0.3%). CRM is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with CRM last updated 21 hours ago and Erxes 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Erxes leverages Golang, SCSS.
Erxes has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to CRM which began 3 months ago. This 9.9-year head start suggests Erxes may have more mature features and established processes.
CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Erxes's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems. However, they also have distinct specializations: Erxes extends into Customer Communication Platforms, Marketing Automation.
CRM provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Erxes may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.