Learn how CRM and Erxes differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

CRM appears to have several advantages over Erxes, particularly in popularity, growth, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
CRM leads in popularity with 9,022 stars vs 4,075 stars for Erxes. The 121% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Erxes has 1,308 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
CRM is growing faster, adding 1,882 stars in the last 30 days (+26%) against adding 24 stars for Erxes (+0.6%). CRM is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with CRM last updated 7 days ago and Erxes 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Erxes leverages SCSS, Golang.
Erxes has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to CRM which began 28 days ago. This 9.9-year head start suggests Erxes may have more mature features and established processes.
CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Erxes's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems. However, they also have distinct specializations: Erxes extends into Customer Communication Platforms, Marketing Automation.
CRM provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Erxes may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.