Learn how CRM and Twenty differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
21 hours agoRepository age
3 monthsVersion
v1.16.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
trycompai/crm
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v2.52.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
twentyhq/twenty
Both CRM and Twenty have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Twenty significantly outpaces CRM in community adoption with 60,017 stars compared to 11,733 stars on GitHub. This 5.1x difference suggests Twenty has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Twenty has 9,817 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
CRM is growing faster, adding 787 stars in the last 30 days (+7.2%) against adding 2,362 stars for Twenty (+4.1%). CRM is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with CRM last updated 21 hours ago and Twenty 4 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: CRM uses Python while Twenty leverages NestJS.
Twenty has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to CRM which began 3 months ago. This 3.7-year head start suggests Twenty may have more mature features and established processes.
CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Twenty's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Both CRM and Twenty offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.