Learn how CRM and Twenty differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both CRM and Twenty have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Twenty significantly outpaces CRM in community adoption with 55,750 stars compared to 9,022 stars on GitHub. This 6.2x difference suggests Twenty has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Twenty has 8,765 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
CRM is growing faster, adding 1,882 stars in the last 30 days (+26%) against adding 1,925 stars for Twenty (+3.6%). CRM is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with CRM last updated 7 days ago and Twenty 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: CRM uses Python while Twenty leverages NestJS.
Twenty has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to CRM which began 28 days ago. This 3.7-year head start suggests Twenty may have more mature features and established processes.
CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Twenty's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Both CRM and Twenty offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.