Learn how EspoCRM and Twenty differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both EspoCRM and Twenty have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Twenty significantly outpaces EspoCRM in community adoption with 55,889 stars compared to 3,313 stars on GitHub. This 16.9x difference suggests Twenty has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Twenty has 8,822 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
EspoCRM is growing faster, adding 131 stars in the last 30 days (+4.1%) against adding 1,935 stars for Twenty (+3.6%). EspoCRM is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with EspoCRM last updated 1 day ago and Twenty 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: EspoCRM uses PHP while Twenty leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, NestJS.
EspoCRM has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Twenty which began 4 years ago. This 8.3-year head start suggests EspoCRM may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Both EspoCRM and Twenty offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs