Learn how EspoCRM and Twenty differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both EspoCRM and Twenty have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Twenty significantly outpaces EspoCRM in community adoption with 57,116 stars compared to 3,375 stars on GitHub. This 16.9x difference suggests Twenty has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Twenty has 9,195 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
EspoCRM and Twenty are moving at much the same rate, adding 106 stars and adding 1,891 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+3.2% vs +3.4%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with EspoCRM last updated 2 days ago and Twenty 39 minutes ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: EspoCRM uses PHP while Twenty leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, NestJS.
EspoCRM has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Twenty which began 4 years ago. This 8.3-year head start suggests EspoCRM may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Both EspoCRM and Twenty offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs