Learn how EspoCRM and Twenty differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
10.0.11License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
espocrm/espocrm
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v2.53.1License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
twentyhq/twenty
Both EspoCRM and Twenty have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Twenty significantly outpaces EspoCRM in community adoption with 60,161 stars compared to 3,536 stars on GitHub. This 17.0x difference suggests Twenty has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Twenty has 9,863 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Twenty is growing faster, adding 2,413 stars in the last 30 days (+4.2%) against adding 107 stars for EspoCRM (+3.1%). Twenty is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with EspoCRM last updated 12 hours ago and Twenty 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: EspoCRM uses PHP while Twenty leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, NestJS.
EspoCRM has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Twenty which began 4 years ago. This 8.3-year head start suggests EspoCRM may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Both EspoCRM and Twenty offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.