Learn how Customermates and EspoCRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
15 hours agoRepository age
8 monthsVersion
1.1.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
customermates
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
10.1.1License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
espocrm/espocrm
EspoCRM appears to have several advantages over Customermates, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
EspoCRM significantly outpaces Customermates in community adoption with 3,620 stars compared to 222 stars on GitHub. This 16.3x difference suggests EspoCRM has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, EspoCRM has 1,043 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
EspoCRM is growing faster, adding 127 stars in the last 30 days (+3.6%) against losing 7 stars for Customermates (-3.1%). EspoCRM is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Customermates last updated 15 hours ago and EspoCRM 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Customermates uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, SCSS while EspoCRM leverages PHP.
EspoCRM has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Customermates which began 8 months ago. This 11.6-year head start suggests EspoCRM may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Both Customermates and EspoCRM offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs