Learn how Customermates and Relaticle differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
7 monthsVersion
1.1.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
customermates
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v3.6.8License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
relaticle/relaticle
Relaticle appears to have several advantages over Customermates, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Relaticle significantly outpaces Customermates in community adoption with 1,783 stars compared to 222 stars on GitHub. This 8.0x difference suggests Relaticle has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Relaticle has 224 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Relaticle is growing faster, adding 81 stars in the last 30 days (+4.8%) against losing 1 stars for Customermates (-0.4%). Relaticle is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Customermates last updated 6 hours ago and Relaticle 11 hours ago.
Relaticle has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to Customermates which began 7 months ago. This 1.5-year head start suggests Relaticle may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Both Customermates and Relaticle offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs