Learn how CRM and Customermates differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
3 monthsVersion
v1.16.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
trycompai/crm
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
7 monthsVersion
1.1.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
customermates
CRM appears to have several advantages over Customermates, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
CRM significantly outpaces Customermates in community adoption with 11,682 stars compared to 222 stars on GitHub. This 52.6x difference suggests CRM has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, CRM has 1,719 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
CRM is growing faster, adding 798 stars in the last 30 days (+7.3%) against losing 1 stars for Customermates (-0.4%). CRM is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with CRM last updated 3 days ago and Customermates 6 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with CRM beginning 3 months ago and Customermates 7 months ago.
CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Customermates's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Both CRM and Customermates offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs