Learn how CRM and Customermates differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
14 days agoRepository age
4 monthsVersion
v1.16.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
trycompai/crm
Last 30 days
Last commit
15 hours agoRepository age
8 monthsVersion
1.1.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
customermates
CRM appears to have several advantages over Customermates, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
CRM significantly outpaces Customermates in community adoption with 12,107 stars compared to 222 stars on GitHub. This 54.5x difference suggests CRM has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, CRM has 1,798 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
CRM is growing faster, adding 753 stars in the last 30 days (+6.6%) against losing 7 stars for Customermates (-3.1%). CRM is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with CRM last updated 14 days ago and Customermates 15 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: CRM uses Python while Customermates leverages SCSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with CRM beginning 4 months ago and Customermates 8 months ago.
CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Customermates's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Both CRM and Customermates offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs