What is the main difference between Atomic CRM and Customermates?

Atomic CRM and Customermates are both crm systems but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Atomic CRM or Customermates?

The choice between Atomic CRM and Customermates depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Atomic CRM to Customermates?

Migration between Atomic CRM and Customermates is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Windshift – The self-hosted platform that replaces Jira.

Learn more

Atomic CRM vs Customermates

Learn how Atomic CRM and Customermates differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.

Atomic CRM

Build a customizable CRM that matches your company's vision, designed for developers and loved by end users.

Visit Atomic CRM Read more

1,402stars+117(+9.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
22 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v1.6.0
License
MIT
Repository
marmelab/atomic-crm

Customermates

Open-source CRM alternative with AI agents, n8n automation, and GDPR compliance. Ready in 2 minutes with transparent pricing and no feature bloat.

Visit Customermates Read more

222stars-1(-0.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 hours ago
Repository age
7 months
Version
1.1.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
customermates

Detailed Comparison

Atomic CRM appears to have several advantages over Customermates, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Atomic CRM wins

Community & Popularity

Atomic CRM significantly outpaces Customermates in community adoption with 1,402 stars compared to 222 stars on GitHub. This 6.3x difference suggests Atomic CRM has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Atomic CRM has 888 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Atomic CRM wins

Growth Momentum

Atomic CRM is growing faster, adding 117 stars in the last 30 days (+9.1%) against losing 1 stars for Customermates (-0.4%). Atomic CRM is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Atomic CRM last updated 22 hours ago and Customermates 6 hours ago.

Atomic CRM wins

Project Maturity

Atomic CRM has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to Customermates which began 7 months ago. This 1.8-year head start suggests Atomic CRM may have more mature features and established processes.

Atomic CRM wins

Licensing

Atomic CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Customermates's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.

Customermates wins

Hosting & Deployment

Customermates provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Atomic CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.