Ad
 
Learn more

Atomic CRM vs EspoCRM

Learn how Atomic CRM and EspoCRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Atomic CRM

Atomic CRM

Build a customizable CRM that matches your company's vision, designed for developers and loved by end users.
  • Stars


    934
  • Forks


    627
  • Last commit


    4 days ago
  • Repository age


    2 years
  • License


    MIT
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Atomic CRM
Favicon of EspoCRM

EspoCRM

Open-source CRM software for managing customers, companies, projects and opportunities. Intuitive interface with cloud and self-hosted options available.
  • Stars


    2,894
  • Forks


    836
  • Last commit


    20 hours ago
  • Repository age


    12 years
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of EspoCRM

Detailed Comparison

EspoCRM appears to have several advantages over Atomic CRM, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

EspoCRM wins
Community & Popularity

EspoCRM significantly outpaces Atomic CRM in community adoption with 2,894 stars compared to 934 stars on GitHub. This 3.1x difference suggests EspoCRM has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, EspoCRM has 836 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Atomic CRM last updated 4 days ago and EspoCRM 20 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Atomic CRM uses Typescript, JSX while EspoCRM leverages CSS, PHP.

EspoCRM wins
Project Maturity

EspoCRM has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Atomic CRM which began 2 years ago. This 9.8-year head start suggests EspoCRM may have more mature features and established processes.

Atomic CRM wins
Licensing

Atomic CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than EspoCRM's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.

EspoCRM wins
Hosting & Deployment

EspoCRM provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Atomic CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.