What is the main difference between Atomic CRM and EspoCRM?

Atomic CRM and EspoCRM are both crm systems but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Atomic CRM or EspoCRM?

The choice between Atomic CRM and EspoCRM depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Atomic CRM to EspoCRM?

Migration between Atomic CRM and EspoCRM is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Docmost – Open-source wiki software with real-time collaboration, diagrams, AI, SSO, RBAC permissions and more.

Learn More

Atomic CRM vs EspoCRM

Learn how Atomic CRM and EspoCRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.

Atomic CRM

Build a customizable CRM that matches your company's vision, designed for developers and loved by end users.

Visit Atomic CRM Read more

1,201stars+51(+4.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 days ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v1.5.0
License
MIT
Repository
marmelab/atomic-crm

EspoCRM

Open-source CRM software for managing customers, companies, projects and opportunities. Intuitive interface with cloud and self-hosted options available.

Visit EspoCRM Read more

3,259stars+108(+3.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
14 hours ago
Repository age
12 years
Version
10.0.5
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
espocrm/espocrm

Detailed Comparison

Both Atomic CRM and EspoCRM have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

EspoCRM wins

Community & Popularity

EspoCRM leads in popularity with 3,259 stars vs 1,201 stars for Atomic CRM. The 171% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, EspoCRM has 936 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Atomic CRM wins

Growth Momentum

Atomic CRM is growing faster, adding 51 stars in the last 30 days (+4.4%) against adding 108 stars for EspoCRM (+3.4%). Atomic CRM is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Atomic CRM last updated 6 days ago and EspoCRM 14 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Atomic CRM uses Typescript, JSX while EspoCRM leverages CSS, PHP.

EspoCRM wins

Project Maturity

EspoCRM has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Atomic CRM which began 2 years ago. This 9.8-year head start suggests EspoCRM may have more mature features and established processes.

Atomic CRM wins

Licensing

Atomic CRM uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than EspoCRM's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.

EspoCRM wins

Hosting & Deployment

EspoCRM provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Atomic CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.