Learn how EspoCRM and Macro CRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
10.0.10License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
espocrm/espocrm
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v2026.10.18.0License
AGPL-3.0Repository
macro-inc/macro
Both EspoCRM and Macro CRM have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with EspoCRM having 3,502 stars and Macro CRM having 4,778 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, EspoCRM has 1,011 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Macro CRM is growing faster, adding 414 stars in the last 30 days (+9.5%) against adding 126 stars for EspoCRM (+3.7%). Macro CRM is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with EspoCRM last updated 4 hours ago and Macro CRM 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: EspoCRM uses PHP while Macro CRM leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri.
EspoCRM has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Macro CRM which began 1 year ago. This 11.3-year head start suggests EspoCRM may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
EspoCRM provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.