Learn how EspoCRM and Macro CRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.

EspoCRM appears to have several advantages over Macro CRM, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
EspoCRM significantly outpaces Macro CRM in community adoption with 3,182 stars compared to 692 stars on GitHub. This 4.6x difference suggests EspoCRM has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, EspoCRM has 918 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with EspoCRM last updated 2 days ago and Macro CRM 10 hours ago.
EspoCRM has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Macro CRM which began 9 months ago. This 11.3-year head start suggests EspoCRM may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
EspoCRM provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
License
Repository