Learn how Customermates and Macro CRM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
7 monthsVersion
1.1.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
customermates
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v2026.10.22.3License
AGPL-3.0Repository
macro-inc/macro
Both Customermates and Macro CRM have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Macro CRM significantly outpaces Customermates in community adoption with 4,935 stars compared to 222 stars on GitHub. This 22.2x difference suggests Macro CRM has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Macro CRM has 480 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Macro CRM is growing faster, adding 530 stars in the last 30 days (+12%) against losing 1 stars for Customermates (-0.4%). Macro CRM is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Customermates last updated 6 hours ago and Macro CRM 9 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Customermates beginning 7 months ago and Macro CRM 1 year ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems.
Customermates provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs