Learn how Pangolin and Tailscale differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
1.26.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
fosrl/pangolin
Last 30 days
Last commit
20 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v1.104.5License
BSD-3-ClauseRepository
tailscale/tailscale
Tailscale appears to have several advantages over Pangolin, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Tailscale leads in popularity with 38,782 stars vs 23,346 stars for Pangolin. The 66% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Tailscale has 3,439 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Tailscale is growing faster, adding 1,463 stars in the last 30 days (+3.9%) against adding 306 stars for Pangolin (+1.3%). Tailscale is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Pangolin last updated 2 days ago and Tailscale 20 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Pangolin uses Python, Next.js while Tailscale leverages C, Objective-C, Swift, Lua.
Tailscale has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Pangolin which began 2 years ago. This 4.7-year head start suggests Tailscale may have more mature features and established processes.
Tailscale uses the BSD-3-Clause license, which is more permissive than Pangolin's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access.
Pangolin provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Tailscale may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.