Learn how Pangolin and Tailscale differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Tailscale appears to have several advantages over Pangolin, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Tailscale leads in popularity with 35,357 stars vs 22,383 stars for Pangolin. The 58% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Tailscale has 3,085 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Tailscale is growing faster, adding 1,262 stars in the last 30 days (+3.7%) against adding 593 stars for Pangolin (+2.7%). Tailscale is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Pangolin last updated 9 hours ago and Tailscale 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Pangolin uses Python, Next.js while Tailscale leverages C, Objective-C, Swift, Lua.
Tailscale has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Pangolin which began 2 years ago. This 4.7-year head start suggests Tailscale may have more mature features and established processes.
Tailscale uses the BSD-3-Clause license, which is more permissive than Pangolin's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access, VPN & Secure Tunnels.
Pangolin provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Tailscale may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.