Learn how Pangolin and Tailscale differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Tailscale appears to have several advantages over Pangolin, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Tailscale leads in popularity with 30,787 stars vs 20,369 stars for Pangolin. The 51% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Tailscale has 2,481 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Pangolin last updated 2 hours ago and Tailscale 47 minutes ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Pangolin uses Python, Next.js while Tailscale leverages C, Objective-C, Swift, Lua.
Tailscale has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Pangolin which began 2 years ago. This 4.7-year head start suggests Tailscale may have more mature features and established processes.
Tailscale is licensed under BSD-3-Clause, while Pangolin's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access, VPN & Secure Tunnels.
Pangolin provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Tailscale may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.