Pangolin vs WireGuard

Pangolin significantly outpaces WireGuard in community adoption with 23,224 stars compared to 735 stars on GitHub. This 31.6x difference suggests Pangolin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Pangolin has 808 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

WireGuard is growing faster, adding 15 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 294 stars for Pangolin (+1.3%). WireGuard is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Pangolin shows more recent development activity with its last commit 12 hours ago, while WireGuard was last updated 6 months ago. This suggests Pangolin is being more actively maintained.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Pangolin uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while WireGuard leverages Rust, C, Objective-C, C++, Haskell.

WireGuard has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Pangolin which began 2 years ago. This 4.8-year head start suggests WireGuard may have more mature features and established processes.

The projects use different licenses: Pangolin is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while WireGuard uses GPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access.

Pangolin provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while WireGuard may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.