Pangolin vs WireGuard

Pangolin significantly outpaces WireGuard in community adoption with 22,472 stars compared to 705 stars on GitHub. This 31.9x difference suggests Pangolin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Pangolin has 764 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Pangolin is growing faster, adding 577 stars in the last 30 days (+2.6%) against adding 5 stars for WireGuard (+0.7%). Pangolin is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Pangolin shows more recent development activity with its last commit 11 hours ago, while WireGuard was last updated 4 months ago. This suggests Pangolin is being more actively maintained.

WireGuard has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Pangolin which began 2 years ago. This 4.8-year head start suggests WireGuard may have more mature features and established processes.

The projects use different licenses: Pangolin is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while WireGuard uses GPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access, VPN & Secure Tunnels. However, they also have distinct specializations: WireGuard extends into Network Security.

Pangolin provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while WireGuard may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.