Learn how Tailscale and WireGuard differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v1.104.7License
BSD-3-ClauseRepository
tailscale/tailscale
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 days agoRepository age
7 yearsLicense
GPL-2.0Repository
wireguard-tools
Tailscale appears to have several advantages over WireGuard, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Tailscale significantly outpaces WireGuard in community adoption with 39,160 stars compared to 744 stars on GitHub. This 52.6x difference suggests Tailscale has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Tailscale has 3,490 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Tailscale is growing faster, adding 1,515 stars in the last 30 days (+4%) against adding 16 stars for WireGuard (+2.2%). Tailscale is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Tailscale last updated 5 hours ago and WireGuard 5 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Golang, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Tailscale uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, Swift, Lua while WireGuard leverages Python, Rust, C++, Haskell.
Both projects started around the same time, with Tailscale beginning 7 years ago and WireGuard 7 years ago.
Tailscale uses the BSD-3-Clause license, which is more permissive than WireGuard's GPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access.