Learn how OpenVPN and Tailscale differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both OpenVPN and Tailscale have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Tailscale leads in popularity with 36,257 stars vs 14,520 stars for OpenVPN. The 150% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenVPN has 3,392 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Tailscale is growing faster, adding 1,273 stars in the last 30 days (+3.6%) against adding 162 stars for OpenVPN (+1.1%). Tailscale is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenVPN last updated 24 hours ago and Tailscale 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenVPN uses Python, Perl while Tailscale leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Golang, Swift, Lua.
OpenVPN has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Tailscale which began 7 years ago. This 7.9-year head start suggests OpenVPN may have more mature features and established processes.
Tailscale is licensed under BSD-3-Clause, while OpenVPN's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access. However, they also have distinct specializations: Tailscale extends into VPN & Secure Tunnels.
OpenVPN provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Tailscale may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.