Learn how OpenVPN and Tailscale differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Tailscale appears to have several advantages over OpenVPN, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Tailscale leads in popularity with 35,357 stars vs 14,400 stars for OpenVPN. The 146% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenVPN has 3,383 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Tailscale is growing faster, adding 1,262 stars in the last 30 days (+3.7%) against adding 137 stars for OpenVPN (+1%). Tailscale is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenVPN last updated 10 hours ago and Tailscale 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenVPN uses Python, Perl while Tailscale leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Golang, Swift, Lua.
OpenVPN has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Tailscale which began 7 years ago. This 7.9-year head start suggests OpenVPN may have more mature features and established processes.
Tailscale is licensed under BSD-3-Clause, while OpenVPN's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access. However, they also have distinct specializations: Tailscale extends into VPN & Secure Tunnels.