Learn how OpenVPN and Tailscale differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
15 yearsVersion
v2.7.9Self-hosted
YesRepository
openvpn/openvpn
Last 30 days
Last commit
20 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v1.104.5License
BSD-3-ClauseRepository
tailscale/tailscale
Both OpenVPN and Tailscale have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Tailscale leads in popularity with 38,782 stars vs 14,783 stars for OpenVPN. The 162% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Tailscale has 3,439 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Tailscale is growing faster, adding 1,463 stars in the last 30 days (+3.9%) against adding 127 stars for OpenVPN (+0.9%). Tailscale is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenVPN last updated 11 hours ago and Tailscale 20 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenVPN uses Python, Perl while Tailscale leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Golang, Swift, Lua.
OpenVPN has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Tailscale which began 7 years ago. This 7.9-year head start suggests OpenVPN may have more mature features and established processes.
Tailscale is licensed under BSD-3-Clause, while OpenVPN's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access.
OpenVPN provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Tailscale may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.