Learn how OpenVPN and Pangolin differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
15 yearsVersion
v2.7.9Self-hosted
YesRepository
openvpn/openvpn
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
1.26.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
fosrl/pangolin
Pangolin appears to have several advantages over OpenVPN, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Pangolin leads in popularity with 23,346 stars vs 14,783 stars for OpenVPN. The 58% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenVPN has 3,430 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Pangolin is growing faster, adding 306 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 127 stars for OpenVPN (+0.9%). Pangolin is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenVPN last updated 11 hours ago and Pangolin 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenVPN uses C, Objective-C, Perl while Pangolin leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang.
OpenVPN has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Pangolin which began 2 years ago. This 12.6-year head start suggests OpenVPN may have more mature features and established processes.
Pangolin is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while OpenVPN's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access.
Both OpenVPN and Pangolin offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.