What is the main difference between OpenVPN and Pangolin?

OpenVPN and Pangolin are both vpn & secure access tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: OpenVPN or Pangolin?

The choice between OpenVPN and Pangolin depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from OpenVPN to Pangolin?

Migration between OpenVPN and Pangolin is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.

Learn More

Learn more

OpenVPN vs Pangolin

Learn how OpenVPN and Pangolin differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.

OpenVPN

Secure remote access VPN solutions with zero trust network access. Self-hosted and cloud-managed options for businesses of all sizes. Trusted by 20,000+ organizations.

Visit OpenVPN Read more

Stars
13,560
Forks
3,287
Last commit
3 hours ago
Repository age
14 years

View Repository

Auto-fetched 44 minutes ago.

Pangolin

Deploy zero trust access to infrastructure, self-hosted apps, and SaaS tools in days. Identity-aware security with seamless user experience.

Visit Pangolin Read more

Stars
20,369
Forks
653
Last commit
2 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 44 minutes ago.

Detailed Comparison

Both OpenVPN and Pangolin have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.

Pangolin wins

Community & Popularity

Pangolin leads in popularity with 20,369 stars vs 13,560 stars for OpenVPN. The 50% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenVPN has 3,287 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with OpenVPN last updated 3 hours ago and Pangolin 2 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenVPN uses C, Objective-C, Perl while Pangolin leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang.

OpenVPN wins

Project Maturity

OpenVPN has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Pangolin which began 2 years ago. This 12.6-year head start suggests OpenVPN may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access. However, they also have distinct specializations: Pangolin extends into VPN & Secure Tunnels.

Pangolin wins

Hosting & Deployment

Pangolin provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenVPN may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Other tool comparisons to consider