Learn how OpenVPN and Pangolin differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Pangolin appears to have several advantages over OpenVPN, particularly in popularity, growth, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Pangolin leads in popularity with 22,383 stars vs 14,400 stars for OpenVPN. The 55% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenVPN has 3,383 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Pangolin is growing faster, adding 593 stars in the last 30 days (+2.7%) against adding 137 stars for OpenVPN (+1%). Pangolin is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenVPN last updated 10 hours ago and Pangolin 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenVPN uses C, Objective-C, Perl while Pangolin leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang.
OpenVPN has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Pangolin which began 2 years ago. This 12.6-year head start suggests OpenVPN may have more mature features and established processes.
Pangolin is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while OpenVPN's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access. However, they also have distinct specializations: Pangolin extends into VPN & Secure Tunnels.
Pangolin provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenVPN may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.