Learn how Netbird and OpenVPN differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Activity score

Both Netbird and OpenVPN have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
Netbird leads in popularity with 26,095 stars vs 14,136 stars for OpenVPN. The 85% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenVPN has 3,346 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Netbird last updated 23 hours ago and OpenVPN 16 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Netbird uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Golang while OpenVPN leverages Python, C, Objective-C, Perl.
OpenVPN has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Netbird which began 5 years ago. This 9.1-year head start suggests OpenVPN may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access. However, they also have distinct specializations: Netbird also focuses on VPN & Secure Tunnels.
Netbird provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenVPN may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.