Learn how Netbird and OpenVPN differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Netbird appears to have several advantages over OpenVPN, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
Netbird leads in popularity with 28,515 stars vs 14,400 stars for OpenVPN. The 98% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenVPN has 3,383 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Netbird is growing faster, adding 1,050 stars in the last 30 days (+3.8%) against adding 137 stars for OpenVPN (+1%). Netbird is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Netbird last updated 8 hours ago and OpenVPN 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Netbird uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Golang while OpenVPN leverages Python, C, Objective-C, Perl.
OpenVPN has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Netbird which began 5 years ago. This 9.1-year head start suggests OpenVPN may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access. However, they also have distinct specializations: Netbird also focuses on VPN & Secure Tunnels.
Netbird provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenVPN may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.