Learn how FireZone and OpenVPN differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

OpenVPN appears to have several advantages over FireZone, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenVPN leads in popularity with 14,520 stars vs 9,054 stars for FireZone. The 60% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenVPN has 3,392 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenVPN is growing faster, adding 162 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 56 stars for FireZone (+0.6%). OpenVPN is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with FireZone last updated 12 hours ago and OpenVPN 24 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: FireZone uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri, Elixir while OpenVPN leverages Perl.
OpenVPN has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to FireZone which began 6 years ago. This 8.1-year head start suggests OpenVPN may have more mature features and established processes.
FireZone is licensed under Apache-2.0, while OpenVPN's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access. However, they also have distinct specializations: FireZone also focuses on Network Security.
Both FireZone and OpenVPN offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.