Learn how FireZone and OpenVPN differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
1.5.18License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
firezone/firezone
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
15 yearsVersion
v2.7.9Self-hosted
YesRepository
openvpn/openvpn
Both FireZone and OpenVPN have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenVPN leads in popularity with 14,783 stars vs 9,171 stars for FireZone. The 61% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenVPN has 3,430 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
FireZone and OpenVPN are moving at much the same rate, adding 63 stars and adding 127 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.7% vs +0.9%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with FireZone last updated 9 hours ago and OpenVPN 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: FireZone uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri, Elixir while OpenVPN leverages Perl.
OpenVPN has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to FireZone which began 7 years ago. This 8.1-year head start suggests OpenVPN may have more mature features and established processes.
FireZone is licensed under Apache-2.0, while OpenVPN's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access.
Both FireZone and OpenVPN offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.