Learn how FireZone and Tailscale differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Tailscale appears to have several advantages over FireZone, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Tailscale significantly outpaces FireZone in community adoption with 36,992 stars compared to 9,106 stars on GitHub. This 4.1x difference suggests Tailscale has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Tailscale has 3,261 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Tailscale is growing faster, adding 1,179 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 61 stars for FireZone (+0.7%). Tailscale is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with FireZone last updated 4 hours ago and Tailscale 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, C, Objective-C, Swift. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: FireZone uses Python, Next.js, Rust, Kotlin, Tauri, Elixir while Tailscale leverages Golang, Lua.
Both projects started around the same time, with FireZone beginning 6 years ago and Tailscale 7 years ago.
Tailscale uses the BSD-3-Clause license, which is more permissive than FireZone's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access.
FireZone provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Tailscale may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.