Learn how FireZone and Pangolin differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both FireZone and Pangolin have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Pangolin leads in popularity with 20,369 stars vs 8,580 stars for FireZone. The 137% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Pangolin has 653 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with FireZone last updated 1 hour ago and Pangolin 2 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: FireZone uses Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri, Elixir while Pangolin leverages Golang.
FireZone has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Pangolin which began 2 years ago. This 4.5-year head start suggests FireZone may have more mature features and established processes.
FireZone is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Pangolin's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access. However, they also have distinct specializations: FireZone also focuses on Network Security while Pangolin extends into VPN & Secure Tunnels.
Both FireZone and Pangolin offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.