What is the main difference between FireZone and Pangolin?

FireZone and Pangolin are both vpn & secure access tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: FireZone or Pangolin?

The choice between FireZone and Pangolin depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from FireZone to Pangolin?

Migration between FireZone and Pangolin is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.

Learn More

FireZone vs Pangolin

Learn how FireZone and Pangolin differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.

FireZone

Replace your VPN with zero-trust access built on WireGuard. Fast, scalable network security with simple policies and identity provider integration.

Visit FireZone Read more

9,038stars+304(+3.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
8 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
1.5.19
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
firezone/firezone

Pangolin

Deploy zero trust access to infrastructure, self-hosted apps, and SaaS tools in days. Identity-aware security with seamless user experience.

Visit Pangolin Read more

22,383stars+593(+2.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
1.21.1
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
fosrl/pangolin

Detailed Comparison

Both FireZone and Pangolin have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Pangolin wins

Community & Popularity

Pangolin leads in popularity with 22,383 stars vs 9,038 stars for FireZone. The 148% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Pangolin has 757 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

FireZone wins

Growth Momentum

FireZone is growing faster, adding 304 stars in the last 30 days (+3.5%) against adding 593 stars for Pangolin (+2.7%). FireZone is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with FireZone last updated 8 hours ago and Pangolin 9 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: FireZone uses C, Rust, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri, Elixir while Pangolin leverages Golang.

FireZone wins

Project Maturity

FireZone has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Pangolin which began 2 years ago. This 4.5-year head start suggests FireZone may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: FireZone is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Pangolin uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access. However, they also have distinct specializations: FireZone also focuses on Network Security while Pangolin extends into VPN & Secure Tunnels.

Comparable