Learn how FireZone and Pangolin differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both FireZone and Pangolin have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Pangolin leads in popularity with 22,951 stars vs 9,106 stars for FireZone. The 152% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Pangolin has 790 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Pangolin is growing faster, adding 399 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 61 stars for FireZone (+0.7%). Pangolin is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with FireZone last updated 3 hours ago and Pangolin 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: FireZone uses Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri, Elixir while Pangolin leverages Golang.
FireZone has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Pangolin which began 2 years ago. This 4.5-year head start suggests FireZone may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: FireZone is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Pangolin uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access.
Both FireZone and Pangolin offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.