Learn how FireZone and Netbird differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both FireZone and Netbird have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Netbird significantly outpaces FireZone in community adoption with 28,515 stars compared to 9,038 stars on GitHub. This 3.2x difference suggests Netbird has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Netbird has 1,616 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Netbird is growing faster, adding 1,050 stars in the last 30 days (+3.8%) against adding 304 stars for FireZone (+3.5%). Netbird is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with FireZone last updated 8 hours ago and Netbird 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: FireZone uses Python, Next.js, C, Rust, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri, Elixir while Netbird leverages Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with FireZone beginning 6 years ago and Netbird 5 years ago.
FireZone is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Netbird's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access. However, they also have distinct specializations: FireZone also focuses on Network Security while Netbird extends into VPN & Secure Tunnels.
Both FireZone and Netbird offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.