Learn how FireZone and Netbird differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
1.5.18License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
firezone/firezone
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v0.82.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
netbirdio/netbird
Both FireZone and Netbird have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Netbird significantly outpaces FireZone in community adoption with 30,779 stars compared to 9,171 stars on GitHub. This 3.4x difference suggests Netbird has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Netbird has 1,839 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Netbird is growing faster, adding 943 stars in the last 30 days (+3.2%) against adding 63 stars for FireZone (+0.7%). Netbird is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with FireZone last updated 9 hours ago and Netbird 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: FireZone uses Python, Next.js, Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri, Elixir while Netbird leverages Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with FireZone beginning 7 years ago and Netbird 6 years ago.
FireZone is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Netbird's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access.
Both FireZone and Netbird offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.