Learn how Netbird and WireGuard differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Netbird appears to have several advantages over WireGuard, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Netbird significantly outpaces WireGuard in community adoption with 28,654 stars compared to 705 stars on GitHub. This 40.6x difference suggests Netbird has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Netbird has 1,629 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Netbird is growing faster, adding 927 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 5 stars for WireGuard (+0.7%). Netbird is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Netbird shows more recent development activity with its last commit 8 hours ago, while WireGuard was last updated 4 months ago. This suggests Netbird is being more actively maintained.
WireGuard has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Netbird which began 5 years ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests WireGuard may have more mature features and established processes.
WireGuard is licensed under GPL-2.0, while Netbird's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access, VPN & Secure Tunnels. However, they also have distinct specializations: WireGuard extends into Network Security.
Netbird provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while WireGuard may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.