Learn how Netbird and WireGuard differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v0.83.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
netbirdio/netbird
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 days agoRepository age
7 yearsLicense
GPL-2.0Repository
wireguard-tools
Both Netbird and WireGuard have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Netbird significantly outpaces WireGuard in community adoption with 31,015 stars compared to 744 stars on GitHub. This 41.7x difference suggests Netbird has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Netbird has 1,859 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Netbird is growing faster, adding 998 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 16 stars for WireGuard (+2.2%). Netbird is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Netbird last updated 11 hours ago and WireGuard 5 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Netbird uses CSS, Typescript, JSX while WireGuard leverages Python, Rust, C, Objective-C, C++, Haskell.
WireGuard has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Netbird which began 6 years ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests WireGuard may have more mature features and established processes.
WireGuard is licensed under GPL-2.0, while Netbird's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access.
Netbird provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while WireGuard may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.