Learn how FireZone and WireGuard differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

FireZone appears to have several advantages over WireGuard, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
FireZone significantly outpaces WireGuard in community adoption with 9,043 stars compared to 705 stars on GitHub. This 12.8x difference suggests FireZone has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, FireZone has 450 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
FireZone is growing faster, adding 128 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 5 stars for WireGuard (+0.7%). FireZone is both larger and pulling further ahead.
FireZone shows more recent development activity with its last commit 9 hours ago, while WireGuard was last updated 4 months ago. This suggests FireZone is being more actively maintained.
Both projects started around the same time, with FireZone beginning 6 years ago and WireGuard 7 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: FireZone is licensed under Apache-2.0 while WireGuard uses GPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access, Network Security. However, they also have distinct specializations: WireGuard extends into VPN & Secure Tunnels.
FireZone provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while WireGuard may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.