Learn how OpenVPN and WireGuard differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
19 hours agoRepository age
15 yearsVersion
v2.7.8Self-hosted
YesRepository
openvpn/openvpn
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 months agoRepository age
7 yearsLicense
GPL-2.0Repository
wireguard-tools
OpenVPN appears to have several advantages over WireGuard, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenVPN significantly outpaces WireGuard in community adoption with 14,726 stars compared to 735 stars on GitHub. This 20.0x difference suggests OpenVPN has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenVPN has 3,421 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
WireGuard is growing faster, adding 15 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 120 stars for OpenVPN (+0.8%). WireGuard is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
OpenVPN shows more recent development activity with its last commit 19 hours ago, while WireGuard was last updated 6 months ago. This suggests OpenVPN is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenVPN uses Perl while WireGuard leverages JavaScript, Golang, Rust, C++, Haskell.
OpenVPN has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to WireGuard which began 7 years ago. This 7.8-year head start suggests OpenVPN may have more mature features and established processes.
WireGuard is licensed under GPL-2.0, while OpenVPN's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access.
OpenVPN provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while WireGuard may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.