Learn how Netbird and Tailscale differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Netbird and Tailscale have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Netbird having 28,515 stars and Tailscale having 35,357 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Tailscale has 3,085 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Netbird and Tailscale are moving at much the same rate, adding 1,050 stars and adding 1,262 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+3.8% vs +3.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Netbird last updated 8 hours ago and Tailscale 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Tailscale leverages C, Objective-C, Swift, Lua.
Tailscale has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Netbird which began 5 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests Tailscale may have more mature features and established processes.
Tailscale is licensed under BSD-3-Clause, while Netbird's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access, VPN & Secure Tunnels.
Netbird provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Tailscale may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.