Learn how Netbird and Tailscale differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Tailscale appears to have several advantages over Netbird, particularly in growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Netbird having 29,000 stars and Tailscale having 36,257 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Tailscale has 3,183 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Tailscale is growing faster, adding 1,273 stars in the last 30 days (+3.6%) against adding 810 stars for Netbird (+2.9%). Tailscale is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Netbird last updated 12 hours ago and Tailscale 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Tailscale leverages C, Objective-C, Swift, Lua.
Tailscale has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Netbird which began 5 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests Tailscale may have more mature features and established processes.
Tailscale is licensed under BSD-3-Clause, while Netbird's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access, VPN & Secure Tunnels.
Netbird provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Tailscale may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.