Learn how Netbird and Tailscale differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v0.82.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
netbirdio/netbird
Last 30 days
Last commit
20 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v1.104.5License
BSD-3-ClauseRepository
tailscale/tailscale
Tailscale appears to have several advantages over Netbird, particularly in growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Netbird having 30,779 stars and Tailscale having 38,782 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Tailscale has 3,439 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Tailscale is growing faster, adding 1,463 stars in the last 30 days (+3.9%) against adding 943 stars for Netbird (+3.2%). Tailscale is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Netbird last updated 1 day ago and Tailscale 20 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Tailscale leverages C, Objective-C, Swift, Lua.
Tailscale has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Netbird which began 6 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests Tailscale may have more mature features and established processes.
Tailscale is licensed under BSD-3-Clause, while Netbird's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access.
Netbird provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Tailscale may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.