Learn how Netbird and Pangolin differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vpn & secure access tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v0.82.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
netbirdio/netbird
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
1.26.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
fosrl/pangolin
Both Netbird and Pangolin have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Netbird having 30,779 stars and Pangolin having 23,346 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Netbird has 1,839 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Netbird is growing faster, adding 943 stars in the last 30 days (+3.2%) against adding 306 stars for Pangolin (+1.3%). Netbird is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Netbird last updated 1 day ago and Pangolin 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Pangolin leverages Python, Next.js.
Netbird has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Pangolin which began 2 years ago. This 3.5-year head start suggests Netbird may have more mature features and established processes.
Pangolin is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Netbird's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in VPN & Secure Access.
Both Netbird and Pangolin offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.