Learn how Mattermost and Spacebar differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 1 year and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Mattermost appears to have several advantages over Spacebar, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Mattermost significantly outpaces Spacebar in community adoption with 36,323 stars compared to 6,255 stars on GitHub. This 5.8x difference suggests Mattermost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mattermost has 8,547 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Mattermost shows more recent development activity with its last commit 10 hours ago, while Spacebar was last updated 1 year ago. This suggests Mattermost is being more actively maintained.
Mattermost has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Spacebar which began 5 years ago. This 5.7-year head start suggests Mattermost may have more mature features and established processes.
Spacebar is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Mattermost's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Encrypted Communication while Spacebar extends into Community Platforms.
Both Mattermost and Spacebar offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs