Learn how Rocket.Chat and Spacebar differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 1 year and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Rocket.Chat appears to have several advantages over Spacebar, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Rocket.Chat significantly outpaces Spacebar in community adoption with 45,193 stars compared to 6,255 stars on GitHub. This 7.2x difference suggests Rocket.Chat has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Rocket.Chat has 13,533 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Rocket.Chat shows more recent development activity with its last commit 11 hours ago, while Spacebar was last updated 1 year ago. This suggests Rocket.Chat is being more actively maintained.
Rocket.Chat has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Spacebar which began 5 years ago. This 5.8-year head start suggests Rocket.Chat may have more mature features and established processes.
Spacebar is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Rocket.Chat's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rocket.Chat also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office while Spacebar extends into Community Platforms.
Both Rocket.Chat and Spacebar offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs