Learn how Decap CMS and Strapi differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
3.17.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
decaporg/decap-cms
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v5.59.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
strapi/strapi
Both Decap CMS and Strapi have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Strapi significantly outpaces Decap CMS in community adoption with 73,381 stars compared to 19,447 stars on GitHub. This 3.8x difference suggests Strapi has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Strapi has 9,915 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Decap CMS and Strapi are moving at much the same rate, adding 43 stars and adding 141 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.2% vs +0.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Decap CMS last updated 3 days ago and Strapi 1 day ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Decap CMS beginning 12 years ago and Strapi 11 years ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS.
Both Decap CMS and Strapi offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.