Learn how Craft CMS and Decap CMS differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
5.11.5.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
craftcms/cms
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
3.17.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
decaporg/decap-cms
Decap CMS appears to have several advantages over Craft CMS, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Decap CMS significantly outpaces Craft CMS in community adoption with 19,447 stars compared to 3,620 stars on GitHub. This 5.4x difference suggests Decap CMS has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Decap CMS has 3,142 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Craft CMS and Decap CMS are moving at much the same rate, adding 12 stars and adding 43 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.3% vs +0.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Craft CMS last updated 8 hours ago and Decap CMS 3 days ago.
Decap CMS has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Craft CMS which began 10 years ago. This 2.1-year head start suggests Decap CMS may have more mature features and established processes.
Decap CMS is licensed under MIT, while Craft CMS's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS.
Both Craft CMS and Decap CMS offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.