Learn how Decap CMS and Payload differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
3.17.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
decaporg/decap-cms
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v3.92.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
payloadcms/payload
Both Decap CMS and Payload have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Payload leads in popularity with 45,498 stars vs 19,447 stars for Decap CMS. The 134% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Payload has 4,339 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Payload is growing faster, adding 521 stars in the last 30 days (+1.2%) against adding 43 stars for Decap CMS (+0.2%). Payload is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Decap CMS last updated 3 days ago and Payload 2 days ago.
Decap CMS has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Payload which began 6 years ago. This 6.0-year head start suggests Decap CMS may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS.
Both Decap CMS and Payload offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.