Learn how Decap CMS and TinaCMS differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
3.17.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
decaporg/decap-cms
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
3.15.0License
Apache-2.0Repository
tinacms/tinacms
Decap CMS appears to have several advantages over TinaCMS, particularly in maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Decap CMS having 19,447 stars and TinaCMS having 13,847 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Decap CMS has 3,142 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Decap CMS and TinaCMS are moving at much the same rate, adding 43 stars and adding 38 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.2% vs +0.3%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Decap CMS last updated 3 days ago and TinaCMS 8 hours ago.
Decap CMS has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to TinaCMS which began 7 years ago. This 4.6-year head start suggests Decap CMS may have more mature features and established processes.
Decap CMS uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than TinaCMS's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS.
Decap CMS provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while TinaCMS may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.