Learn how Decap CMS and Marble CMS differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these headless cms tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
3.17.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
decaporg/decap-cms
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
2 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Repository
usemarble/marble
Decap CMS appears to have several advantages over Marble CMS, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Decap CMS significantly outpaces Marble CMS in community adoption with 19,447 stars compared to 384 stars on GitHub. This 50.6x difference suggests Decap CMS has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Decap CMS has 3,142 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Decap CMS is growing faster, adding 43 stars in the last 30 days (+0.2%) against losing 1 stars for Marble CMS (-0.3%). Decap CMS is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Decap CMS last updated 3 days ago and Marble CMS 4 days ago.
Decap CMS has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Marble CMS which began 2 years ago. This 10.0-year head start suggests Decap CMS may have more mature features and established processes.
Decap CMS uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Marble CMS's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Headless CMS.
Decap CMS provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Marble CMS may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.