Learn how Convex and Supabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Supabase appears to have several advantages over Convex, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Supabase significantly outpaces Convex in community adoption with 101,471 stars compared to 11,408 stars on GitHub. This 8.9x difference suggests Supabase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Supabase has 12,189 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Convex last updated 2 days ago and Supabase 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js, Rust, C, Objective-C, Vue, Kotlin, SvelteKit. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Convex uses Golang, Ruby, MATLAB, Remix while Supabase leverages SCSS, Swift, Elixir, Tanstack Start, Dart.
Supabase has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Convex which began 2 years ago. This 4.5-year head start suggests Supabase may have more mature features and established processes.
Supabase is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Convex's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS).
Both Convex and Supabase offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.