Learn how Convex and Encore differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Convex and Encore have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Convex and Encore show comparable community engagement with 12,478 and 12,334 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Convex has 808 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Convex and Encore are moving at much the same rate, adding 168 stars and adding 137 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.4% vs +1.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Convex last updated 26 minutes ago and Encore 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Golang, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Convex uses CSS, JSX, Python, Next.js, C, Objective-C, Vue, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, SvelteKit, Remix.
Encore has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Convex which began 2 years ago. This 3.1-year head start suggests Encore may have more mature features and established processes.
Encore is licensed under MPL-2.0, while Convex's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS). However, they also have distinct specializations: Encore extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools, Development Environments.
Convex provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Encore may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.