Learn how Encore and Supabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Supabase appears to have several advantages over Encore, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Supabase significantly outpaces Encore in community adoption with 101,495 stars compared to 11,871 stars on GitHub. This 8.5x difference suggests Supabase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Supabase has 12,195 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Encore last updated 8 hours ago and Supabase 1 hour ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Encore uses Golang while Supabase leverages CSS, JSX, Python, Next.js, SCSS, C, Objective-C, Vue, Swift, Kotlin, SvelteKit, Elixir, Tanstack Start, Dart.
Supabase has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Encore which began 5 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests Supabase may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Encore is licensed under MPL-2.0 while Supabase uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS). However, they also have distinct specializations: Encore also focuses on PaaS & Deployment Tools, Development Environments.
Supabase provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Encore may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.