Instant vs Supabase
Learn how Instant and Supabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.
Learn how Instant and Supabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.
Instant
Stars
10,199Forks
352Last commit
1 hour agoRepository age
2 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0
Auto-fetched .
Supabase
Stars
101,495Forks
12,195Last commit
1 hour agoRepository age
7 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
Yes
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
Supabase appears to have several advantages over Instant, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Supabase appears to have several advantages over Instant, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Supabase significantly outpaces Instant in community adoption with 101,495 stars compared to 10,199 stars on GitHub. This 10.0x difference suggests Supabase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Supabase has 12,195 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Instant last updated 1 hour ago and Supabase 1 hour ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Instant uses Java, Nuxt.js, Clojure while Supabase leverages Python, SCSS, Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, SvelteKit, Elixir, Tanstack Start, Dart.
Project Maturity
Supabase has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Instant which began 2 years ago. This 4.9-year head start suggests Supabase may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS). However, they also have distinct specializations: Instant also focuses on NoSQL & Document Databases.
Hosting & Deployment
Supabase provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Instant may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.