Instant vs Supabase
Learn how Instant and Supabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.
Learn how Instant and Supabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.
Instant
Stars
10,198Forks
352Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
2 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0
Auto-fetched .
Supabase
Stars
101,471Forks
12,189Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
Yes
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
Supabase appears to have several advantages over Instant, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Supabase appears to have several advantages over Instant, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Supabase significantly outpaces Instant in community adoption with 101,471 stars compared to 10,198 stars on GitHub. This 10.0x difference suggests Supabase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Supabase has 12,189 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Instant last updated 2 days ago and Supabase 12 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Instant uses Java, Nuxt.js, Clojure while Supabase leverages Python, SCSS, Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, SvelteKit, Elixir, Tanstack Start, Dart.
Project Maturity
Supabase has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Instant which began 2 years ago. This 4.9-year head start suggests Supabase may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS). However, they also have distinct specializations: Instant also focuses on NoSQL & Document Databases.
Hosting & Deployment
Supabase provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Instant may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.