Learn how Convex and Instant differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsSelf-hosted
YesRepository
convex-backend
Last 30 days
Last commit
15 days agoRepository age
2 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0Repository
instantdb/instant
Both Convex and Instant have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Convex having 12,774 stars and Instant having 10,564 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Convex has 842 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Convex is growing faster, adding 130 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 23 stars for Instant (+0.2%). Convex is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Convex last updated 7 hours ago and Instant 15 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Convex uses Python, Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, SvelteKit, Remix while Instant leverages Java, Nuxt.js, Clojure.
Both projects started around the same time, with Convex beginning 3 years ago and Instant 2 years ago.
Instant is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Convex's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS). However, they also have distinct specializations: Instant extends into NoSQL & Document Databases.
Convex provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Instant may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.