Learn how Convex and Instant differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both Convex and Instant have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Convex having 11,408 stars and Instant having 10,198 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Convex has 693 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Convex last updated 2 days ago and Instant 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Convex uses Python, Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, SvelteKit, Remix while Instant leverages Java, Nuxt.js, Clojure.
Both projects started around the same time, with Convex beginning 2 years ago and Instant 2 years ago.
Instant is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Convex's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS). However, they also have distinct specializations: Instant extends into NoSQL & Document Databases.
Convex provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Instant may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.