Learn how Bknd and Convex differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v0.21.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
bknd-io/bknd
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
3 yearsSelf-hosted
YesRepository
convex-backend
Both Bknd and Convex have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Convex significantly outpaces Bknd in community adoption with 12,774 stars compared to 3,780 stars on GitHub. This 3.4x difference suggests Convex has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Convex has 846 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Convex is growing faster, adding 100 stars in the last 30 days (+0.8%) against adding 11 stars for Bknd (+0.3%). Convex is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Bknd last updated 8 days ago and Convex 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, SvelteKit. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Convex leverages Python, Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, Vue, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, Remix.
Both projects started around the same time, with Bknd beginning 2 years ago and Convex 3 years ago.
Bknd is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Convex's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS).
Both Bknd and Convex offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.