What is the main difference between Bknd and Supabase?

Bknd and Supabase are both backend-as-a-service (baas) tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Bknd or Supabase?

The choice between Bknd and Supabase depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Bknd to Supabase?

Migration between Bknd and Supabase is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Docmost – Open-source wiki software with real-time collaboration, diagrams, AI, SSO, RBAC permissions and more.

Learn More

Bknd vs Supabase

Learn how Bknd and Supabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.

Bknd

Lightweight Firebase alternative with database, auth, storage, and workflows. Framework-agnostic backend that integrates with NextJS, Remix, Hono and more.

Visit Bknd Read more

3,749stars+14(+0.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
5 months ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v0.20.0
License
Apache-2.0
Repository
bknd-io/bknd

Supabase

Provides a full backend stack built on Postgres: authentication, auto-generated APIs, edge functions, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and vector search.

Visit Supabase Read more

108,160stars+1,497(+1.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
7 years
Version
v1.26.08
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
supabase/supabase

Sponsor Supabase ongithub.com

Detailed Comparison

Supabase appears to have several advantages over Bknd, particularly in popularity, growth, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Supabase wins

Community & Popularity

Supabase significantly outpaces Bknd in community adoption with 108,160 stars compared to 3,749 stars on GitHub. This 28.9x difference suggests Supabase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Supabase has 13,590 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Supabase wins

Growth Momentum

Supabase is growing faster, adding 1,497 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 14 stars for Bknd (+0.4%). Supabase is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Supabase wins

Development Activity

Supabase shows more recent development activity with its last commit 7 hours ago, while Bknd was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests Supabase is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, SvelteKit. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Supabase leverages Python, SCSS, C, Rust, Objective-C, Vue, Swift, Kotlin, Elixir, Tanstack Start, Dart.

Supabase wins

Project Maturity

Supabase has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Bknd which began 2 years ago. This 5.2-year head start suggests Supabase may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS).

Supabase wins

Hosting & Deployment

Supabase provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Bknd may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Other tool comparisons to consider