Learn how Bknd and Supabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Supabase appears to have several advantages over Bknd, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Supabase significantly outpaces Bknd in community adoption with 110,876 stars compared to 3,766 stars on GitHub. This 29.4x difference suggests Supabase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Supabase has 15,356 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Supabase is growing faster, adding 2,265 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 14 stars for Bknd (+0.4%). Supabase is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Bknd last updated 5 days ago and Supabase 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, SvelteKit. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Supabase leverages Python, SCSS, Rust, C, Objective-C, Vue, Swift, Kotlin, Elixir, Tanstack Start, Dart.
Supabase has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Bknd which began 2 years ago. This 5.2-year head start suggests Supabase may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS).
Both Bknd and Supabase offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.