Bknd vs Supabase

Supabase significantly outpaces Bknd in community adoption with 108,978 stars compared to 3,756 stars on GitHub. This 29.0x difference suggests Supabase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Supabase has 13,732 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Supabase is growing faster, adding 1,243 stars in the last 30 days (+1.2%) against adding 10 stars for Bknd (+0.3%). Supabase is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Supabase shows more recent development activity with its last commit 14 hours ago, while Bknd was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests Supabase is being more actively maintained.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, SvelteKit. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Supabase leverages Python, SCSS, Rust, C, Objective-C, Vue, Swift, Kotlin, Elixir, Tanstack Start, Dart.

Supabase has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Bknd which began 2 years ago. This 5.2-year head start suggests Supabase may have more mature features and established processes.

Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS).

Both Bknd and Supabase offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.