Ad
 
Learn More

Convex vs NHost

Learn how Convex and NHost differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Convex

Convex

Open-source reactive database that keeps your web and mobile apps in sync. Write everything in TypeScript with built-in auth, cron jobs, and AI integration.
12,478stars+168(+1.4%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of Convex
Favicon of NHost

NHost

Fully managed backend infrastructure with built-in authentication, database, storage, and serverless functions for rapid application development.
9,285stars+19(+0.2%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit


    47 minutes ago
  • Repository age


    6 years
  • Version


    3.5.2
  • License


    MIT
  • Repository


    nhost/nhost
Screenshot of NHost

Detailed Comparison

Both Convex and NHost have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable
Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Convex having 12,478 stars and NHost having 9,285 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Convex has 808 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Convex wins
Growth Momentum

Convex is growing faster, adding 168 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 19 stars for NHost (+0.2%). Convex is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Convex last updated 26 minutes ago and NHost 47 minutes ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang, C, Objective-C, Vue, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, SvelteKit. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Convex uses Python, Rust, Remix.

NHost wins
Project Maturity

NHost has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Convex which began 2 years ago. This 3.1-year head start suggests NHost may have more mature features and established processes.

NHost wins
Licensing

NHost is licensed under MIT, while Convex's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS). However, they also have distinct specializations: NHost extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools.

Convex wins
Hosting & Deployment

Convex provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while NHost may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.