Learn how Convex and NHost differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsSelf-hosted
YesRepository
convex-backend
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
1.52.2License
MITRepository
nhost/nhost
Both Convex and NHost have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Convex having 12,774 stars and NHost having 9,382 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Convex has 842 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Convex is growing faster, adding 130 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 50 stars for NHost (+0.5%). Convex is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Convex last updated 7 hours ago and NHost 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang, C, Objective-C, Vue, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, SvelteKit. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Convex uses Python, Rust, Remix.
NHost has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Convex which began 3 years ago. This 3.1-year head start suggests NHost may have more mature features and established processes.
NHost is licensed under MIT, while Convex's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS). However, they also have distinct specializations: NHost extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools.
Convex provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while NHost may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.