NHost vs Supabase
Learn how NHost and Supabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.
Learn how NHost and Supabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.
NHost
Supabase
Stars
101,471Forks
12,189Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
Yes
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
Supabase appears to have several advantages over NHost, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Supabase appears to have several advantages over NHost, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Supabase significantly outpaces NHost in community adoption with 101,471 stars compared to 9,139 stars on GitHub. This 11.1x difference suggests Supabase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Supabase has 12,189 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with NHost last updated 2 days ago and Supabase 10 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, C, Objective-C, Vue, Kotlin, SvelteKit. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: NHost uses Golang, Ruby, MATLAB while Supabase leverages Python, SCSS, Rust, Swift, Elixir, Tanstack Start, Dart.
Project Maturity
Supabase has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to NHost which began 5 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests Supabase may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
NHost uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Supabase's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS). However, they also have distinct specializations: NHost also focuses on PaaS & Deployment Tools.
Hosting & Deployment
Supabase provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while NHost may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Logto – Modern auth infrastructure for developers.