What is the main difference between Convex and PocketBase?

Convex and PocketBase are both backend-as-a-service (baas) tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Convex or PocketBase?

The choice between Convex and PocketBase depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Convex to PocketBase?

Migration between Convex and PocketBase is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sevalla – Deploy your app before your coffee gets cold. It’s that easy. Try Sevalla with $50 free credit.

Learn More

Convex vs PocketBase

Learn how Convex and PocketBase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.

Convex

Open-source reactive database that keeps your web and mobile apps in sync. Write everything in TypeScript with built-in auth, cron jobs, and AI integration.

Visit Convex Read more

12,478stars+168(+1.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
25 minutes ago
Repository age
2 years
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
get-convex/convex-backend

PocketBase

A lightweight, self-hosted backend solution with real-time database, authentication, and file storage capabilities.

Visit PocketBase Read more

60,934stars+486(+0.8%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
4 years
Version
v0.40.2
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
pocketbase/pocketbase

Detailed Comparison

PocketBase appears to have several advantages over Convex, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

PocketBase wins

Community & Popularity

PocketBase significantly outpaces Convex in community adoption with 60,934 stars compared to 12,478 stars on GitHub. This 4.9x difference suggests PocketBase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, PocketBase has 3,671 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Convex wins

Growth Momentum

Convex is growing faster, adding 168 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 486 stars for PocketBase (+0.8%). Convex is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Convex last updated 25 minutes ago and PocketBase 1 day ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Convex uses CSS, Bash, JSX, Python, Next.js, Rust, C, Objective-C, Vue, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, SvelteKit, Remix while PocketBase leverages SCSS.

PocketBase wins

Project Maturity

PocketBase has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Convex which began 2 years ago. This 1.7-year head start suggests PocketBase may have more mature features and established processes.

PocketBase wins